|
Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 10:44AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 10:52AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 232 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 11:37AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 03:03PM |
Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 219 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 03:43PM |
Admin Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 20,056 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 04:14PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 04:21PM |
Admin Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 20,056 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 04:31PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 04:35PM |
Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 219 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 04:40PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 04:42PM |
Admin Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 20,056 |
sata@45900000 {
status = "okay";
};
sata@45910000 {
status = "okay";
};
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 04:42PM |
Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 219 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 05:09PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 05:19PM |
Admin Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 20,056 |
sata@45900000 {
status = "okay";
nr-ports = <2>;
};
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 05:34PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
> sata@45900000 {
> status = "okay";
> nr-ports = <2>;
> };
>
>
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 05:36PM |
Admin Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 20,056 |
I already found out myself that uboot had only one SATAdevise set on and it needed to be changed
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 05:49PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
> I already found out myself that uboot had only one > SATAdevise set on and it needed to be changed >>
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 05:57PM |
Admin Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 20,056 |
sata@45900000 {
compatible = "plxtech,nas782x-sata";
/* port sgdma core */
reg = <0x45900000 0x100>, <0x459B0000 0x10>, <0x459E0000 0x2000>,
/* phy descriptors (optional) */
<0x44900000 0x0C>, <0x50000000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <0 18 0x304>;
clocks = <&stdclk 4>;
resets = <&rst 11>, <&rst 12>, <&rst 13>;
reset-names = "sata", "link", "phy";
status = "disabled";
};
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 06:23PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree April 30, 2014 07:21PM |
Admin Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 20,056 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree May 01, 2014 03:18AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree May 01, 2014 03:37PM |
Admin Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 20,056 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree May 03, 2014 12:00AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree May 03, 2014 03:35PM |
Admin Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 20,056 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree May 10, 2014 03:26AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree May 10, 2014 04:36AM |
Admin Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 20,056 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree May 10, 2014 06:09AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |
|
Re: Ox820 device tree May 10, 2014 01:26PM |
Admin Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 20,056 |
Quote
> It seems to me like the whole trouble comes from
> the device tree. I suppose SATA_OXNAS_MAX_PORTS =
> 1 setting in kernel sata_oxnas.c file is hard
> coded solely because port count has not come
> properly from device tree and someone has decided
> to hard code it there.
>
> Am I right?
> I suppose SATA_OXNAS_MAX_PORTS setting should come
> from device tree and hard coding has been done
> because this has not been working properly.
>
|
Re: Ox820 device tree May 10, 2014 06:40PM |
Admin Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 20,056 |
Quote
> BTW: I took a look at your kernel. My device does
> not have PCI and it will not boot with PCI enabled
> kernel. If you can compile it without PCI support
> I can give it a try.
|
Re: Ox820 device tree May 11, 2014 04:35AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 68 |