Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 19, 2012 09:19AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 21 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 19, 2012 04:14PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 501 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 22, 2012 03:19AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 21 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 22, 2012 06:53AM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 501 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 23, 2012 04:44AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 21 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 23, 2012 11:32PM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 6 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 24, 2012 03:58AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 15 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 24, 2012 07:08AM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 501 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 27, 2012 02:22AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 23 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 27, 2012 12:06PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 378 |
CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT=y to # CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT is not set
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 27, 2012 12:24PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 378 |
nanddump -s 0xc0000 -l 0x20000 -f uboot.env.bin /dev/mtd0
nanddump -b -o -s 0xc0000 -l 0x20000 -f uboot.env.bin /dev/mtd0is the correct command to backup the environment as a binary.
GoFlexNet> help env import env - environment handling commands Usage: env default -f - reset default environment env edit name - edit environment variable env export [-t | -b | -c] [-s size] addr [var ...] - export environment env import [-d] [-t | -b | -c] addr [size] - import environment env print [name ...] - print environment env run var [...] - run commands in an environment variable env save - save environment env set [-f] name [arg ...]
mw 0x800000 0xffff 0x40000 tftpboot 0x800000 uboot.env.bin env import -t 0x800000 0x20000
saveenv
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 27, 2012 04:28PM |
Admin Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 18,821 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 28, 2012 12:08PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 378 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 30, 2012 04:40AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 23 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 30, 2012 12:30PM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 6 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 30, 2012 12:34PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 378 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 30, 2012 01:21PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 501 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? April 30, 2012 01:26PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 501 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? May 13, 2012 12:39PM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 136 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? May 13, 2012 01:57PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 501 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? May 14, 2012 01:21AM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 136 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? May 14, 2012 04:17PM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 136 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? May 14, 2012 04:49PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 501 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? May 14, 2012 07:15PM |
Admin Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 304 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? May 14, 2012 10:54PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 501 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? May 15, 2012 02:03AM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 136 |
Quote
davygravy
I thank you so much for trying that. When you say it didn't preserve it do you mean that it would have to be restored from the env that is nanddumped just before flashing? Or ?
Quote
davygravy
Also, what about upgrading U-Boot on a Debian system? Or other (e.g. ArchLinuxARM)? I'm assuming that this script just handles new installs...or does it also work with upgrades?
Robert Mugabe
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? May 15, 2012 04:27AM |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? May 15, 2012 04:41PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 501 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? May 16, 2012 02:02AM |
Admin Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 18,821 |
Re: Newer uBoot as workaround to 3.2 kernel problem? May 26, 2012 03:56PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 501 |